Articles Posted in Divorce Attorney

Published on:

divorceAll marriages experience ups and downs, but when are things serious enough to consider a divorce? Research indicates common themes in the literature predictive of divorce:

Feelings of Contempt: If you or your spouse resorts to contemptuous feelings and behaviors when dealing with problems, the marriage may be at risk. Regardless of the issue at hand, eye rolling, sarcasm, berating, and name-calling lead to a feeling of helplessness. Problems cannot be solved in this environment.  Passive-aggressive statements are yet another symptom of contempt.  Instead, couples should address complaints without blame or criticisms.

Scorekeeping: When one spouse is more focused on keeping score in a marriage than on building a loving relationship, it can spell disaster. Successful marriages cannot be centered on winning and losing. Spouses should instead consider strong communication, love, and forgiveness a win-win.

Differing Goals: Does one of you want a big family and the other hate the idea of kids?  Does one want to party whenever possible, and the other prefer cozy nights at home? Is traveling the globe the ultimate dream for one of you, while the other is completely comfortable planted in the neighborhood in which you have always lived? When couples have huge differences in the things they want from life, if can make for a challenging marriage.

One Person does all the Compromising: Does one person always hold out to get the final say on the tv shows you watch or the restaurants you go to? Does one spouse feel disappointment that the other shows minimal interest in his or her needs on a day-to-day basis? Compromise is a key factor in successful marriages, but when one spouse is constantly expected to give in to the other’s desires, it can lead to feelings of resentment. It makes one wonder about the motivations for staying with someone who is not concerned about who you are or what you need.

Bad Views Rule: Research indicates that couples who remember the sweet, tender beginnings of their relationship, even when going through tough times, are more likely to survive. Alternately, if the focus is on the shortfalls of the other spouse and the mutual admiration and respect has dissipated, the marriage is in trouble.

Debt: One of the biggest stressors to any marriage is money trouble, particularly if one spouse is a big spender and the other is not. In that circumstance, the risk for divorce is 45% more likely. Setting and living within a budget can save unnecessary arguments and harrowing stress.

A Lousy Sex Life: When antagonism, or a simple lack of interest in your spouse, results in a limited or nonexistent sex life, the marriage is in trouble. Healthy communication and the ability to enjoy one another intimately can build a bond that helps couples through challenging times.

You do Not Spend Time Together: Couples who do not share hobbies and interests, as well as other friendships, are at greater risk of divorce. Particularly, when one spouse purposefully becomes detached, the relationship should be evaluated.

Stonewalling: Spouses who evade one another or punish with the cold shoulder are avoiding solving their issues. Instead of open and clear dialogue, problems become swept under the rug, where they fester until they have to be addressed—usually with anger.

Wedding Planning Issues: Beware if planning the wedding became more important than the relationship between the couple. Continue reading →

Published on:

Going through a divorce and settling all related issues can be trying. Most people want to put the marriage and legal issues behind them once the divorce is finalized. Unfortunately, this is often not the case. Frequently, a former spouse will return to court in the years following a divorce in order to revisit legal matters or raise new complaints. Each time you return to court can be costly, and acrimonious tendencies may arise again. It is always important to have an experienced family law attorney on your side, one who can help you get the outcome you deserve and make the process of returning to court easier amark sanfordnd less costly.

The Ongoing Case of U.S. Representative Mark Sanford

Mark Sanford is a member of the United States House of Representatives and a former governor of South Carolina. In 2009, Sanford disappeared unannounced for several days; his assistant claimed Sanford was hiking the Appalachian Trail. When he returned, Sanford admitted to having an affair with a woman in Argentina. Sanford’s wife, Jenny, subsequently filed for divorce. The divorce was granted and finalized in 2010.

Published on:

Divorce is almost never an enjoyable proposition. Once a relationship gets to the point where one or more spouses want to end their marriage, odds are that they have already experienced years of problems. To make matters worse, the divorce itself can be expensive, combative, and emotionally draining. It is imperative that anyone contemplating a divorce find a highly competent divorce attorney to represent their interests and guide them through a difficult process.

ThinkerWhat to Look for in a Good Divorce Attorney

Here are some qualities you may want to look for when you search for a good divorce attorney:

1. Find an attorney with experience handling divorce cases: It is important to hire not only a family law attorney, but one who specifically handles divorces. Ask your potential attorney how many divorce cases he has handled, or what percentage of his (or his firm’s) hours are devoted to divorces. Even if you already retain an attorney for other personal matters (such as your finances), it is a good idea to find a different attorney to handle your divorce. This is especially true since your personal attorney may also represent your wife, and therefore would have a conflict of interest in relation to your divorce case.

2. If you have children with your spouse, find an attorney with experience in child custody disputesChild custody and visitation disputes tend to pop up during and after divorce proceedings. You will want to anticipate these conflicts and be prepared to present your side of the case forcefully. You probably want to see as much of your kids as you can, and a good attorney can help make that happen.

3. Ask your potential attorney how long the divorce proceedings will last: This will give you an idea of how long the process will take, so that you can plan accordingly. It will also help you discern how honest and competent your potential attorney is. It is important that you are aware of any deadlines and waiting periods that you can expect before you initiate the divorce.

4. Ask your potential attorney how much the divorce will cost you: This is another way to figure out if your attorney is a good choice or not. He should be able to give you a rough estimate of the total costs of the divorce, including court fees, attorney’s fees, and potential costs of mediation. This will also help you to plan financially for what lies ahead.

5. Talk with your potential attorney about what outcomes you can expect from the divorce: Your attorney should be able to give you a range of possible resolutions you can expect from your case. The more experience he has, and the more honest he is, the better he will be able to predict the outcome, allowing you to formulate a plan.

What to Do if You Are Planning to Get Divorced

Continue reading →

Published on:

The number of women committing adultery has increased significantly according to a recent survey conducted by the National Opinion Research Center challenging the notion that men are more adulterous than their female counterparts. Bloomberg Businessweek published data from the survey. According to the survey, while the percentage of men admitting to infidelity has remained consistent at about 21 percent for the past several years, the number of women admitting to adultery has increased significantly. For example, between 2010 and 2013, the number of women who admitted to cheating on their partners went from almost 15 percent to nearly 40 percent.

Greater economic independence is one factor that has contributed to the rise in infidelity amongst women.

Pepper Schwartz, a sociologist at the University of Washington attributes the rise in the number of women who cheat on their partners to changes in the country’s cultural and economic climate. With higher incomes and greater job prospects than ever before, women can now afford the possible economic consequences of having an affair.

Published on:

Earlier this year, Jamie McCourt, the former CEO of the Los Angeles Dodgers and ex-wife of the Major League Baseball franchise’s former owner, Frank McCourt, filed a petition to overturn the couples’ divorce settlement. The divorce settlement was reached in 2011 when Frank McCourt still owned the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Piggy Bank.jpg
In the couple’s 2011 divorce settlement, Jamie McCourt gave up her ownership claim to the Los Angeles Dodgers in exchange for $131 million.
The terms of the couple’s divorce settlement provided Jamie McCourt with $131 million in addition to a share of the couples residences. In exchange, Jamie McCourt gave up her ownership claim to the Major League Baseball franchise.
Jamie McCourt argues that Frank McCourt represented that the franchise was worth less than $300 million but sold the team for $2.15 billion just six months later.
In the petition filed earlier this year, Jamie McCourt argued that she agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement because her former husband misled her regarding the value of the Los Angeles Dodgers franchise. Jamie McCourt alleged that her ex-husband represented that the Major League Baseball franchise was valued at less than $300 million while under the penalty of perjury. However, just six months after the couple’s divorce settlement was finalized Frank McCourt sold the team for $2.15 billion through a bankruptcy court auction.
A Los Angeles Judge ruled this week that Jamie McCourt did not provide sufficient evident to support her allegations of fraud.
This week, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Scott M. Gordon issued a ruling denying Jamie McCourt’s petition. In his opinion, the Judge reasoned that Jamie McCourt failed to provide the Court with sufficient evidence to prove that she did not have a full and complete understanding of the value of the couple’s assets when she agreed to the divorce settlement. The Judge went on to reason that Jamie McCourt was a sophisticated individual who had familiarity with the business, having served as the franchise’s CEO.
Study reveals that couples routinely hide financial information from one another.

A Forbes magazine article published last year revealed that partners routinely hide assets from each other, both when their marriage is going well and during divorce proceedings. The article cited a study conducted by the National Endowment for Financial Education which found that 58 percent of spouses report hiding cash from their partners and 34 percent admitted to lying about their finances, debt, or earnings.
Misrepresenting information in a Financial Affidavit that is filed with the court in a divorce proceeding is illegal and can result in serious penalties. If you believe that your former spouse misrepresented financial information during your divorce proceeding and settlement process, you should contact an attorney immediately. An attorney will be able to review the circumstances of your case and determine your options for recourse.
Related Blog Posts:

What Happens to Joint Mortgage Debt in a Divorce?

The Pitfalls of Relying on News Sources for Divorce Guidance

Continue reading →

Published on:

In most cases, when a couple decides to separate and file for divorce their ownership in real estate acquired during the marriage and the resulting mortgage debt is the largest investment which they must split up. The division of debt is a complex process and requires parties to consider various issues at the same time. This can be a difficult task at any given time and becomes even more taxing when individuals are dealing with the stress of a separation. As such, it is important for married couples that own real estate together and have mortgage debt to consult with an experienced divorce attorney who can guide them through this process. Mortgage Debt.jpg
A party is still liable for their joint mortgage obligation even when a court issues a divorce decree requiring their spouse to pay mortgage payments.
One of the most confusing aspects of a having a joint loan obligation with your spouse is the limitations of a divorce decree requiring your former spouse to maintain jointly owned properties or obligating your former spouse to pay mortgage payments. Unfortunately, a judicial decree of this type during your divorce proceeding does not absolve you from the loan obligation you share with your former spouse. This does not mean that you do not have other recourse against your former spouse if they fail to follow the court’s other. However, those measures will not protect your credit or change your legal obligation to lenders. Loan obligations are binding contacts, the terms of which must be satisfied even after a divorce.
It’s best to end a marriage with as little joint debt as possible.
For this reason, many divorce attorneys advise their clients who are considering filing for divorce to end their marriage with as little joint debt as possible. However, in recent years, the decline of the real estate market has made this a difficult or non-existent option for some.
If selling property is not an option, one spouse may be able to refinance or assume to mortgage debt.
However, this does not mean that you are without options if you are considering filing for divorce and hold a joint loan obligation with your spouse. You and your spouse may agree to refinance the loan in one of your names, removing the other’s liability for the debt. In some cases, your lender may allow you or your spouse to assume the mortgage debt independently. Both of these solutions require at least one spouse to possess the financial means to repay the mortgage debt in its entirety. In addition, refinancing often requires that the property have sufficient equity. However, if one of these options works for you and your spouse, interest in the property can be transferred to reflect the mortgage liability via a quitclaim deed or an interspousal transfer grant deed.

Continue reading →

Published on:

On May 8, the California Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that will determine whether an individual possesses marital rights, including the right to sue for the wrongful death of a spouse, when they are believe that their marriage is legally sound, but have not taken all the technical steps to ensure that their marriage is recognized under state law.
The couple was not legally married because husband’s divorce was finalized months after their ceremony, but held themselves out as a married couple.
The case involves a Silicon Valley couple who where married in the fall of 2003, before their family and friends in a large church wedding. Prior to the ceremony, the couple secured a marriage license from the state of California. During the course of their marriage, the couple held themselves out as husband and wife. Thumbnail image for Divorce, Annulment or Legal Separation
Four years into the marriage, the husband was killed in a tragic accident while working for a local constriction company. His wife initiated a wrongful death action against her husband’s employer. The employer argued that she did not have the right to sue because the couple was not legally married. This argument was based on the fact that the husband’s divorce from his first wife was not finalized until several months after the couple had tied the knot.
The wife maintains that she believed the marriage to be valid. She cites the couples large wedding, the fact that she took her husband’s last name, and that she helped take care of his two children from the previous marriage. In court documents, she explained that if the couple had known that their marriage was invalid, they would have taken the steps to become legally recognized as a married couple.
An appellate court found that a spouse possesses the legal right to file for wrongful death of their husband, so long as they genuinely believed the marriage was valid; Supreme Court seems likely to agree.
The trial court handling the wrongful death action agreed with the employer and barred the wife from pursuing the wrongful death action. But, the ruling was reversed on appeal. According to the appellate court, the wife was entitled to file the wrongful death action so long as she “honestly and genuinely” believed the marriage was valid. The employer sought a ruling from the State’s Supreme Court. The argue that that appellate court’s reasoning would lead to poor public policy because wouldn’t trouble themselves with ensuring that they have taken all the appropriate steps to become legally married.
During arguments in the case, the Justices seemed reluctant to strip the wife of her legal rights as a married woman. They expressed that taking such a position would punish individuals who acted under “honest and sincere” belief that they were married. In addition, they stated that such a ruling would contradict the putative spouse doctrine, which protects the financial and property interests of an individual who enters a marriage believing it to be valid. According to one justice, the purpose of such a doctrine is to protect the expectations of innocent parties.
The California Supreme Court has 90 days to issue a ruling in this case.

Continue reading →

Published on:

A recent Forbes article reveals why it is important for couples who are contemplating divorce to rely on the advice of attorneys who specialize in handling such matters, rather than information gleaned through conversations with friends and family, or the tabloids and news outlets.

News accounts regarding the divorce of Bethennay Frankel and her husband have provided erroneous information regarding New York state law and the couples’ property rights.

In the article, the author uses the divorce of Bethenny Frankel from her husband, Jason Hoppy as an example. The couple is best known for their roles on the television show, Real Housewives of New York. Frankel is also the force behind Skinnygirl, a line of low calorie alcoholic drinks. Hoppy is a pharmaceutical sales rep. Frankel and Hoppy filed for divorce in January of this year.

News reports have indicated that the couple continues to live together in their marital home, a $5 million Tribeca loft apartment, with their young daughter, Bryn. These accounts suggest that both parties want to remain in the home because moving out would constitute abandonment of the property under New York state law and make it more difficult to claim the property during the couple’s divorce settlement.

However, this information is erroneous, under New York state law, the couple’s apartment is considered marital property since it was acquired during the marriage using marital assets. This means that the property will be subject to division during the divorce settlement, irrespective of who’s been living at the address during the separation. This has been the law in New York since 2010, when the state established non-fault divorce. Prior to this, leaving the marital home could have been used to make an assertion that the property was abandoned by the leaving spouse.

Couples maintain their property rights in the marital home even if they leave during separation; however it is important to reach an agreement on key issues. Alimony

Although the reference here is to New York law and not that of California, the lesson applies to divorcing couples in California as well. This being said, Laura A. Wasser, a Los Angeles based attorney and author of a forthcoming book about financial matters relating to divorce, states that although she almost always advises clients to establish distance when they separate, it is important for couples to have a serious discussion regarding their property before doing so. Wasser suggests having a conversation about the following issues:

1. Care of the Property: This includes maintenance and interim financial obligations.

2. Property Left in the Home: This includes what property is being given up and what property will be divided and retrieved at a later point.

3. Parameters: This includes what entitlements the leaving spouse has to the home after they leave. Can they use the home on certain occasions or in some circumstances? Or does the remaining spouse receive exclusive use and an expectation of privacy in the home.

Continue reading →

Published on:

One Million.jpgIn October of 2011, former Los Angeles Dodgers owner Frank McCourt and his wife, Jamie McCourt, who served as the Dodgers’ CEO reached a divorce settlement agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Jamie McCourt received $131 million tax-free as well as, ownership of several properties.

However, Jamie McCourt recently filed claims alleging that her former spouse committed fraud by misrepresenting the Dodger’s assets. According to court documents, the misrepresentation resulted in her agreeing to a settlement that was nearly $770 million lower than what she was entitled too. She is back in court seeking a larger settlement.

Jamie McCourt states that Frank McCourt provided her with financial documents which indicated that the Dodger’s assets were valued at less than $300 million, when he knew that their true value was much higher. The information provided to Jamie McCourt did not include the value of a future regional sports network, projected to enhance the team’s value by $1 billion.

According to Franck McCourt’s attorney, Jamie McCourt was provided with details regarding plans to build a regional sports network, but that it wasn’t listed as an asset because it was not yet in existence. Frank McCourt’s attorney argues that Jamie McCourt was provided with the Dodger’s most up-to-date financial documents before settlement was reached and that she failed to do her due diligence prior to agreeing to settlement. During trial, Frank McCourt’s attorney stated that there was no evidence to support Jamie McCourt’s claims of fraud.

In late April, Jamie McCourt testified that she was under the impression that she and Frank McCourt were splitting their assets equally. Jamie McCourt stated that she was surprised to learn that the Dodgers were worth more than she was led to believe when the team sold for $2 billion after the couple’s divorce was finalized.

A ruling in this case is not expected until later this summer. However, if the presiding Judge tosses out the divorce settlement, the former couple will resume previous arguments regarding whether the Dodgers were community property under California law or if they solely belonged to Frank McCourt.

Financial Information Frequently Hidden in Divorce
An article published in Forbes magazine late last year revealed that partners routinely hide assets from each other, including during divorce proceedings. According to a study by the National Endowment for Financial Education, 58 percent of spouses report hiding case from their partners and 34 percent admitted to lying about their finances, debt, or earnings.

Misrepresenting information in a Financial Affidavit that is filed with the court in a divorce proceeding is illegal and can result in serious penalties.

Continue reading →

Published on:

spy.jpgPrivate investigation firms have long offered divorce assistance as a primary service. However, these services can be very expensive and can even cost more than the legal fees associated with filing for a divorce. Because filing for a divorce often comes with financial strains, many individuals who would like to hire a private detective to spy on their spouse, simply cannot afford to do so.

SPYING ON YOUR SPOUSE IS EASIER THAN EVER

However, in recent years more and more information is communicated through email, smartphones, and social media. In fact, a recent survey by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers found that 92 percent of lawyers had observed increases in evidence from smartphones over the past three years. The information gathered from smartphones included text messages, emails, call histories, and GPS location information.

In addition, according to a recent Wall Street Journal article, spyware that was once only accessible to governments and corporations are now cheap and readily available to the general public. According to the article, companies selling GPS trackers, nanny cams, and other spy gear reported significant increases in sales. For example, BrickHouse Security reported that sales of its GPS tracker have nearly doubled each year, for the past three years. Another company, SpygearGadgets.com, said sales of their GPS tracking devices had increased 80 percent in 2012 and their nanny cams and hidden camera sales rose 40 percent.

A CALIFORNIA DIVORCE ATTORNEY CAN HELP YOU MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION

An individual who is considering filing for a divorce may want to spy on their spouse in order to obtain various kinds of evidence. Spying may reveal evidence of:

  • Hidden assets
  • Infidelity
  • Neglectful or abusive treatment of children

However, just because it is easier than ever to obtain evidence for a divorce case by spying on a spouse, doesn’t mean it is the best approach in every circumstance. An attorney can help an individual who is considering filing for a divorce to determine what evidence will be helpful and the best way to go about obtaining the information.

For instance, an individual who is considering filing for divorce may want to know whether their spouse was unfaithful during the marriage. But, this information is typically irrelevant to a divorce proceeding in California. Under California law, all divorces are considered “no fault” divorces. The individual seeking a divorce does not have to prove that their spouse did something wrong. In addition, the court will not penalize a cheating spouse by awarding them less property or requiring them to pay more support.

In addition, the privacy laws surrounding spying on a spouse are currently in flux and not clearly defined. Overzealous spying can subject an individual to stalking, wiretap, cybercrime, and trespass laws, as well as civil suits. Therefore, it is important for anyone who is considering spying on their spouse to consult with an attorney who will be able to navigate this emerging area of law.

RELATED BLOG POSTS:
Social Media in Divorce
Steps to Take After a Divorce

Continue reading →

Contact Information